Archive

Posts Tagged ‘affiliate’

Doug Scott – ASAP Ventures

September 4th, 2008 1 comment

Doug Scott is a very well-known name in Affiliate and Web Marketing circles – and a great subject for an interview, cos he tells it like it is without any bullshit or ‘black art’ stuff. He’s the man behind ASAP Ventures and a host of high-profile domains particularly in the travel and car-hire sectors.

This post would have appeared under the ‘Interviews’ section, except that someone got to Doug before me. However, this interview is so good you’ll want to hear it, believe me.  Fraser, from AffiliateBlog.co.uk did the interview with Doug and they have both agreed to me posting about it and producing a transcript.


I’ve reproduced a few choice snippets here, to give you a taste, and there’s also a PDF version of the full transcript available for download – but you’ll find it worthwhile listening to the whole Podcast, if you can decipher the accents – being a Brummie I speak perfect English but these two guys aren’t as fortunate as me ;-)

The full interview comes in at 40 minutes plus but it’s a great lesson in how things really work.


On Domains:

Fraser: Fly.co.uk that’s a kind of high profile purchase you made recently wasn’t it?

Doug: Yeah, that was GBP 87,500 (approx. $175,000). 

Fraser: That’s quite a big investment.

Doug: Personally, I thought it was a bargain – I thought they gave it away.

Fraser: You think so, that’s good.  So I take it you’re a real believer in a good generic domain name then.

Doug: If you’re going to sell something it’s much easier to sell fly.co.uk rather than dougscheapflights.co.uk.  As a company, what we do is we get traffic to websites. You know, carrentals.co.uk – is a very good generic. It probably does - over the past 5 years, it’s probably done between 50 and 100 million GBP worth of sales.  If we wanted to sell that domain it’s much easier to sell that domain having it as a nice name.  It’s much easier for a corporate to understand what they’re buying.
 
If you look at carrentals alone, that domain has probably had in the region of 5 million GBP spent on it.
Therefore, you might as well spend that much money on a nice domain name.

If you look at Fly.co.uk, that was 87.5k GBP, Recycle was 152k GBP - and I just look and I think, it’s so easy.  The traffic part has never been a problem to us. I always say to people you put content on websites and give them some links – that’s all you have to do.

Traffic & Link-Building:

Fraser: So why would people find the traffic part difficult then?  I know there’d be a lot of people out trying to desperately get traffic to their websites.

Doug: I think that most people don’t believe it.  They do it for 3 months and then stop.

You know, they don’t see the results they expect. I did an explanation yesterday to a couple of people, and they had a website and my first question was how many visitors does it get? And they said 5 a day.  I said, you’ve got 5 now, whatever you did last time do it again ‘cause then you’ll have 10 and then do it again and you’ll have 20 and once you get to a certain point theyre will be a logical point where what you should actually do is turn this into a process and have other people do it or have machines do it.

There’s no point you as an individual sitting in a bedroom trying to manually do everything.

Fraser: So processes for things like getting the content written, doing the link building, those kind of jobs?

Doug: We do processes for everything.  I say we do factory SEO. We have probably about 300 writers now around the world who write content for us.  We used to write it ourself but then it became cheaper to give to someone else in bulk. 

If we do link building, we have machines that do requests, we have people who do requests.  Basically we’ll trial something, trial something, work out how it works and then we will try to make it an automated process or a manual process.

Fraser: That you can then outsource, so you’re not stuck having to doing it yourselves?

Doug: You can outsource or you can build a machine.
 
Fraser: So how do you mean, can I explore that a little bit “build a machine” – you just mean an application that does it for you or what?

Doug ScottDoug: If I’m very simple about it, if you’re looking for links in a sector, what most people will do is, they will go to Google.  They will search for terms relating to their sector, they will try to find the contact forms and the email addresses of those people and then they will manually contact all of them. 

Now, aside from saying the legalities of how you contact them, the collecting of that data, well a machine can do all of that much, much faster than an individual will ever do it.  Now you may put a sanity check in – where we’ve now got all the data, we now get people involved, who then basically before we touch someone will look at the data to make sure it’s what it’s meant to be.

Fraser: Right yeah, so you’re emailing the right people and not asking the wrong sites for links and that kind of stuff?

Doug: Yes, in most cases it’s very limited in what we do about asking people for links anymore.  We have processes now – we’ve just learnt as time goes on that the efficiency of asking people is not the best way of doing it. 

If I went back 4 years ago we would have been doing very much more traditional asking for the link.
 
Now what we would do is we will try and create something and then tell the relevant people who really want to link to it because if you can kick that snowball down the hill the effect is dramatic.  It’s one of the discussions, you know going back to the domain name purchases  – you look at the 2 big ones which people know that we bought was Fly and Recycle.  Now have a look at the back links at any time you want of Fly and Recycle and you’ll see there’s a lot of them and there’s a lot of them based because of how much we paid for it.

Fraser: Right, that’s almost kind of self fulfilling, yeah you spent that money on an instant success because people talk about it because of how much you spent on it.

Doug: Anytime I mention it, anywhere, like here, other people will link to it. It’s the same on my blog, my blog has taught me a huge amount of how to create controversy.

Link-Bait

Fraser: Do you think that’s a good method? I know that some people have frowned at that link bait at money.co.uk saying that if the story’s not true it’s misleading and unethical, I mean  what’s your stance on it?

Doug: Depends on where you going with it.  Ethically wise, I would say I agree, it’s not ethical. Lyndon’s view is, commercially it’s hugely viable. Now if you’re Google what do you do with that I don’t know. What we’ve done in the past is we prefer to create a story – we play – rather than rifle shooting we play a lot more of a random game, a shotgun, where what we will do is we will create a 100 stories and some will get picked up – we don’t know which ones will but once one is picked up we will then exploit it.

So we let the world decide what the story is that wants to be told.

Paid Search:

Doug: Paid search to me now is pure arbitrage business. You know, it’s exactly what happens in money markets and share trading markets.  What you’re looking for is a hole in the market. And there’s enough data out there, if you’ve got access to the data – that’s what it very simply is – at one point we were running one paid search campaign with 4.5 million key words in it.  An individual can not do the analysis on that data – it’s just not physically possible. So you need to have a machine.

You’re changing your bid prices, time of days and things like that but you need to be able to take the data you’ve got and react to it.  It should be possible with enough data to take the click through value, the click through rates, the amount of money you paid on a position in Google – you should be able to forward forecast and reverse forecast what any price should be at any time of the day for any keyword in any month.

From our experience, if you’re in a very targeted niche, say if you’re doing car insurance, an individual will win every time because an individual will physically look at the ads and see how good they are, bad they are, in comparison to what other people are doing, and be able to make gut instinct changes – a machine can’t do that. 

But as soon as you go past the 100 key words – we proved it most of last year, ‘cause we ran 2 parallel campaigns on 2 different sites, and that’s exactly what we found.  The machines just won every time. 


These are just a few snippets from what is a very interesting interview.

Hear the full Podcast at: http://www.affiliateblog.co.uk/doug-scott-asap-ventures-interview.html

Download the full transcript here

I hope you find it entertaining and educational.

Dave 

Online Poker Affiliating – Give This Bad Boy A Chance

September 1st, 2008 No comments

This is a Guest post by Greg Walker from NewPokerAffiliate.com, giving an overview of an area that can bring in big money if you think about what you’re doing and have the right resources to help you. The opinions expressed are Greg’s but he’s quite rightly enthusiastic about his chosen field. Certainly an area worth looking at for anyone who wants to earn some online dollars.

Dave 


Online Poker Affiliating

Let’s not beat around the bush, this article is about online gambling.

No seriously, just give me a chance on this one to let me explain a few things. I know a number of you webmasters are going to completely dismiss the idea of promoting online poker from the start, but that is your own choice and it’s completely up to you what you do with your time spent Internet marketing. However, even from my biased point of view, I’m going to say that you’re missing out on making a lot of money, and I want to give you a run down on the possibilities (as in “how much money you can make”) of being a poker affiliate. 

The Money

The typical commission for sending a real money play to a poker room is $100 or over. It’s not a $1 commission on a book sale from Amazon, neither is it $20 from a SEO ebook sale. It’s $100 (and sometimes more) for every visitor that goes from your site to the poker room and starts playing for real money.

New Poker AffiliateIf you can just get 10 real money players to your site a month, that’s 1K a month. Now, if you create 5 sites like this, you are making 5K a month. There are no tricks here, it’s just basic math.

Let me put it another way: I have worked with people in this industry that are doing pretty well for themselves. Many start out casually promoting poker as more of a hobby than anything, and they end up quitting their jobs and earning more from poker affiliating than they did working for IBM. If you’re doing ‘okay’ as a poker affiliate, you’re earning 5K a month. If you’re doing really well, you’re earning over 100K. The more you work, the more you can earn. 

The Workload & The Returns

Sure, these figures are nice, but they are not going to come overnight, we both know that. However, as far as actual work goes, the time spent creating and developing sites will be no different to the time you spend developing sites in whatever other industries you might already be in (and making money from).

The only difference with poker affiliating is that you need to have the right approach and know what you are doing to be successful. It really is a case of working smarter and not harder.

It might be nice to have a blog about your experiences as an Internet Marketer, but it’s not going to be efficient to create a high maintenance blog in an environment that is difficult to make money in, let alone have it as a flagship site. Your time is best spent elsewhere, and that ‘elsewhere’ could well be in poker.

For example, let’s take a look at a typical well-regarded blog in the MMO niche… TheNetFool. Jim grinds out decent sized articles around common MMO topics on an almost daily basis. Now, if you look over posted earnings records from past months, you will find that the blog makes maybe $400 a month (discounting any spikes/bonuses). He’s not in the Premier League but at that level he is certainly making more than the majority of MMO Bloggers out there.

If you spent your time writing a solid article about poker every day on a poker site, you would be making a hell of a lot more than $400 a month, I will tell you that for free.

You just need to know what you’re doing. If you have experience in creating solid websites and know about good SEO, you really need to start broadening your horizons and considering the possibilities of other industries. 

But I’ve heard poker affiliating is bad!

That’s because the people you are speaking to have failed in their attempts at poker affiliating. It’s much easier to blame the industry than the fact that you took the wrong approach and didn’t work hard enough, it’s human nature. So disregard what other people have told you, and take a look at the facts:

  • Yes, poker affiliating requires work.
  • Yes, you need to know what you’re doing.
  • Yes, it takes time.
  • Yes, many people will give up.
  • Yes, you can make a boat load of money if you do it properly.

I’m not going to try and make out that poker affiliating is some silver bullet that makes you millions from one 10-page website, I just want to let you know that it is a perfectly viable option as an Internet Marketer.

The majority of people do not want to put the effort in to make a successful poker site, and they are happy to move on and complain that it is a terrible industry. However, if you have the drive to do well and create a useful site that brings in traffic from the search engines (Google doesn’t hate poker y’know), then a lot of money is waiting for you.

This time next year you could be earning 10 times what you are earning right now, just because you decided to take a chance as a poker affiliate.

I wish you the best of luck.

For key strategy guides and tips, as well as how to “know what you are doing”, check out New Poker Affiliate.
 

Greg

 

Google steps into Affilate arena

July 12th, 2008 No comments

Hi Everyone – I hoped to get this one out a few days ago but the site move has all been a bit ‘hectic’ ;-)

Following on from its purchase of Doubleclick, Google has re-badged the Performics Affiliate product as the Google Affiliate Network (1st July).

The Affiliate program will operate as a separate ‘entity’ to Adsense, and Publishers will need to apply to join the program even if they are curently Adsense publishers. Once accepted, Publishers will be able to apply to various advertisers and select creative for use on their sites.

Payments will of course be made on a ‘per sale’ basis rather than being based on impressions/clicks and may be flat-fee or commission-based, depending on the individual advertiser. Google says that payments will be made twice per month, although these will be subject to a minimum amount of $50USD per advertiser (it seems that payments due will not be aggregated for the purposes of Publisher payment). I’m assuming that the same payment methods as used for Adsense will be available. They also say that they’ll be offering a VIP/rewards type program to high-performing publishers.

The network’s page currently shows a small but impressive Advertiser list, and my understanding is that the program is still restricted to US advertisers/traffic only (according to a note on this page).

So, it’s a cautious, ‘toe in the water’ type approach but something that will have to be taken seriously, both by site owners who’ll be hoping to get some future leverage from Google’s muscle, and from existing players in the Affiliate marketplace, who may just be getting a bit worried about the effect Google could have on their current cosy arrangements.

I’ve been busy lately with the transfer of Internet Babel but I certainly intend to take a closer look at the program.

I’d really like to hear other people’s thoughts though, both in terms of any first-hand experience and also what you think this is going to do to the Affiliate arena if and when Google really jumps into this in a big way. How will players like CJ, Tradedoubler, Buy.at etc react? Will we see a shake up of the Affiliate marketplace or will things continue pretty much as before with Google just being another of many options?

With Google also dropping its referral program (in August) will we see a gradual integration between the Affiliate Network and Adsense, not just in terms of integrating your Publisher account, but maybe the creation of some kind of Affiliate CPA/Contextual hybrid – where you can choose your Advertiser base but still see a range of contextual ads from those Adverisers on your site?

Might be interesting times ahead – I don’t think the big boys will be too worried yet, but would love to hear your opinions on how this will all play out.

Dave